Jump to content

Talk:The Fall of Troy (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"F.C.P.S.I.T.S.G.E.P.G.E.P.G.E.P."

[edit]

I added it back in. The person who stated that it was a "secret acronym" didn't provide a source proving this.

The guys don't want everyone to know. If you go onto their forums and ask, they'll not tell you. The March of Flames 5:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

But the majority of people know now anyway. Also, if you put "allegedly" or "one popular theory" it's not saying exactly what it stands for, merely being vague about it. Just a suggestion Jubella 15:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Actually, Wikipedia is not censored. It's being added back in. Schizmatic 00:13, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--

So:

  • I've reworded it (diff) as per WP:NPOV, WP:VERIFY, and WP:CITE.
  • However, as someone above accurately pointed out, we currently have no authoritative, verifiable source for reporting as a fact on the second opinion (i.e., "the band wished to keep it secret").
  • Not that providing such source validating the second opinion would warrant deleting the first opinion, mind you. But currently, it's the second opinion that could be suppressed entirely, as per Wikipedia's rules.
  • I propose: let's be fair and give the "hardcore fans" some weeks for getting an official statement from the band -- a small page added on their official website, or a signed post in their official blog, something authoritative and verifiable like that, with a nice URL -- before we may have to delete mention of the second opinion as unsourced. Should be a piece of cake for "hardcore fans" with such close links to the band.
  • Also, maybe should it be reminded that deletion of relevant and verifiable material is both censorship and vandalism, and can lead to being banned? Just a thought.

-- Sarcasm? Wot sarcasm? 62.147.36.186 19:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The sources cited for the F.C.P.S.I.T.S.G.E.P. section is not even credible. Not one member of the band confirmed that it's stands for that. SongMeanings? PunkNews? Anyone could have made it up, put it on Wikipedia and think it's real. It can stand for Fight Chalres Per Siting In The Shit of Getting Everyone Petrified. And I think all of you need to shut the fuck up. This is why Wikipedia sucks. Because everyone is so anal about everything. --The March of Flames 19:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Those sources are perfectly suited to their purpose. This section does not pretend to reveal an official meaning, since there's been no official statement other than "no comment". This section merely REPORTS on a FACT, which is the title's expansion as leaked by various hardcore fans to a larger public.
  • This section provides various and convergent, verifiable sources about this expansion having now been common knowledge for at least one year on the net. This section remains NPOV by providing the other side of the argument. Both sides are provided to the reader to be fully informed, without you deciding what the reader is allowed to know in the first place.
  • You're the one being an anal crybaby trying to censor information, all the more because you know it's true. You're not an elite because you knew what it means. You're not the only one deserving to know it. Grow up and quit whining.
  • Deleting or censoring sourced information is vandalism.
-- 62.147.113.36 23:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • i don't even know what it stands for douche. but good try of accusing me of censorship. i refuse to believe it's the widespread rumor because there was no offical meaning stated by the band. ;)

--The March of Flames 15:48, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:EVR130-TheFallofTroy.jpg

[edit]

Image:EVR130-TheFallofTroy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:13, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Fall of troy-st.jpg

[edit]

Image:Fall of troy-st.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Fall of Troy (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Fall_of_Troy_(album)&oldid=1211408470"