Talk:The Everglow

waht is the everglow based on?

I wish I knew what you were talking about... Could you restate that using different words? Underwater 21:18, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Influence?

They are Christians, they listed God/Jesus as a major influence of theirs in an interview with yahoo launch. Should the part about them not being christians change? Reiver 05:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The most of the members are Christian, (Not sure about all of them) but the band is not. Changing anything might cause confusion. Underwater 23:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think a clarification, stating that many (all?) of the band members are Christians and have publicly stated that their beliefs have influenced their music, would be a helpful addition. The way it is now, simply stating "the truth is that neither the album or the band are Christian," leaves the reader much less informed. I think such an addition would clarify the article, not confuse it. Captain Pringle

Where is a source for saying they're not Christian? The lyrics seem to have plenty of undertones, and "Tisbury Lane" on the B-Sides album even mentions Jesus.

Proof? Right here. There's proof. Now stop denying it, because they're not a Christian band. They just aren't. Underwater 02:35, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, somebody's in a bad mood. I do think the article needs clarification; if they've stated their beliefs influence their music, their beliefs influence their music. "Changing anything" would clarify it, because as it is now it just makes it seem like a total accident that people came to believe they're at all connected to Christianity. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.206.204.204 (talk) 17:29, January 24, 2006

Merge special edition here?

The Everglow Special Edition article contains very little content that is not simply a repeat of content here. For three extra tracks, two or three lines about those tracks, and a new album cover (for which there already exists a specific template for the main infobox: {{extra album cover}}), a separate article doesn't seem necessary. I'm proposing the SE article be merged here. Comments? --Fru1tbat 16:53, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Didn't know the extra album cover, but it makes perfect sense to merge. I can help with the edit after Fru1tbat if you need it. I'm sure you want to give it some time to allow others the chance to get the word in.. --DJREJECTED 23:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm all for a merger. There's nothing substantiative in the Special Edition article that couldn't be concentrated and added to a subsection in the larger Everglow article. Three's a crowd, & it's been a few months...let's do it! Cathryn 03:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I made a crack at merging. I'm not real happy with the dual fields in the infobox, but I couldn't figure out a better way. Feel free to try something else. --Fru1tbat 23:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Everglow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707074958/http://christianmusic.about.com/od/doves/a/06gmanoms.htm to http://christianmusic.about.com/od/doves/a/06gmanoms.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]