Talk:The Equity Project
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Equity Project article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 August 2008. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I'm pretty sure this still needs a little bit of clean-up, but I wanted to get some feedback on how to best do that. I tried to make it a worthy starting point before posting it, at least.JDbruin (talk) 20:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
"Unlike regular public school teachers, these teachers can be fired if they do a bad job, because there will be no union to protect incompetent teachers. To counter the teachers' high salaries, the school will not have any assistant principals, deans, or any of the other bureaucrats who do so much to destroy regular public schools." - Is this appropriate? (Just want to draw someone's attention to this; I will not edit it as I am not an active member of Wikipedia.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.131.18 (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
I added Template:Advert to this article. The article is written in a promotional tone. It doesn't include any discussion of some of the controversies this school as drawn, e.g. those described in an OpenStax textbook here. Ultrauber (talk) 04:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)