Talk:The Eminem Show/GA3

GA Review

Quick failed, as it fails the criteria, as there's a large number of Citation needed tags.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kyle Peake (talk · contribs) 16:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Will take a look at this soon... --Kyle Peake (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Fail

I hate to be that guy, especially as someone who is a big fan of the album, but I am going to have to quick fail this. The criteria for immediate failure mentions how an article can be failed if it has a large number of Citation needed tags, which this article has four of and the entire Censored version sub-section is two paragraphs that are 100% unreferenced, basically certifying the failure. Plus there are easily noticeable other issues on top of this, such as the lead being too extensive and the year-end charts not being separated for different years. --Kyle Peake (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kyle Peake. I will get to trying to fill in the remaining missing citations. As I have cut down the lead to make it more summarised, can you give additional advice? I would also appreciate if you can highlight whether there are any other improvements needed. In addition, do you know how I could get another user to fix the year-end charts formatting as I'm not too familiar with making it correct. Thanks. Isaacsorry (talk) 20:40, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Isaacsorry: Since this article has been met with a quick fail, I'll only highlight those key issues as more will be risen if this is renominated at a later date. As for the charts, see the GA The Life of Pablo for help splitting. --Kyle Peake (talk) 04:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.