Talk:The Dublin City Rounders

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Irish music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Irish music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Irish musicWikipedia:WikiProject Irish musicTemplate:WikiProject Irish musicIrish music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Music

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Patootik (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Notability

As per tag and edit summ notes, I wonder whether additional detail is needed. I'm not sure WP:MUSIC is yet covered. WP:SIGCOV on its own should be enough. In honesty I wonder whether (what might appear to some to be) "passing mentions" in the Indo and IT strictly would strictly meet SIGCOV guidelines. It seems to me that the subject is just starting out, and so SIGCOV issues might be considered subjectively. However, only if other relevant criteria were covered (Namely: awards or noms, chart position, radio play, etc.) While the latter appears to be asserted, it seems a little questionable to me. (No judgement, just trying to understand, but my read is that we're saying that Sunshine radio and FM104 are national stations. On the former, I'm not sure which one we are talking about. On the latter, it is not a national station. Is this just an error? Could we clarify? Frankly it doesn't really matter what the case, but it looks a little off when we seem to imply something that isn't 100%. When some of the simpler statements don't hold-up, it will make the reader (or editor) question other aspects. In addressing these issues, I might point out that WP:COI guidelines exist for a reason, and it might be worth considering those also. Guliolopez (talk) 22:59, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that some of the issues raised above are resolved (certainly the "uncertainty" on the radio play assertion is fixed). However, as noted, I'm not confident the issues wrt Notality/Music guidelines are fully addressed:

I still wonder whether SIGCOV is actually met (to my read, there are a few "passing mentions" in news sources. These don't represent broader reviews or coverage events that would typically be required under SIGCOV guidelines).
I also wonder whether the specific "yardsticks" of Notability/Music are met (while there is a suggestion of one record getting some limited airplay, I'm not sure this covers what the guidelines expect. And the other criteria (charting/awards/etc) aren't covered.

I still think this is a case of WP:TOOSOON, but would welcome other thoughts. (Though I would ask that editors contributing to a discussion on this make note of WP:COI guidelines, and declare any association with the subject that might be relevant). Guliolopez (talk) 12:16, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Dublin City Rounders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150522042810/http://www.kilkennyroots.com/index.php/2015-artists to http://www.kilkennyroots.com/index.php/2015-artists

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]