Jump to content

Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Basic stuff and comments

[edit]
  • Improve the non-free use rationale for the image with this template.
  • That being said, the infobox looks good.
  • Lead summarizes the entire article so no problems there.
  • Plot section looks good as well.
  • Couldn't find any issues in #Writing or #Reception.
  • However, I would add another subsection/header to #References. You can decide which one (see example 1 and example 2).
  • With that in mind, references themselves are in great shape.

Progress

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina! I've addressed both points; let me know if there's any other work you think this article would benefit from. Kindly —Collint c 17:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Bobamnertiopsis: The non-free use rationale was not improved. You can simply do this by copy-and-pasting the template and filling in several key parameters including the article, use, author, and source. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Aha, I understand now. Added! —Collint c 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Dragon_and_the_Doctor/GA1&oldid=1019644186"