Jump to content

Talk:The Distinguished Gentleman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remake

[edit]

The tags at the bottom indicate that this film is listed on the film remakes page, but no mention of it being a remake (or what movie it is a remake of) is made in the article. 66.68.6.110 04:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. 24.207.160.25 06:48, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disney assembly line

[edit]

The Entertainment Weekly review does not say that this was the first film by Murphy which was not produced by Paramount. I moved the review down to External links. I deleted the trivia section, as both entries were unsupported, and that kind of section as a whole is deprecated. Binksternet (talk) 18:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One of the three references is no good; the part that says this was the first Disney movie by Murphy was a blog entry, not the article itself. I'm rewriting the factoid to make it more encyclopedic, and I'm deleting BlackVoices as a reference.
  • Old way it was phrased:
    • This was the first film starring Eddie Murphy that was not released by Paramount Pictures.[ref][ref][ref]
  • New way:
    • Eddie Murphy appeared in this Disney-produced film after a string of Paramount Pictures star vehicles.[ref] Bernie Weinraub, film reviewer for the New York Times, offered his opinion that Murphy wished to "move beyond the tepid material" he had been given by Paramount.[ref] Writer and producer Marty Kaplan said of Murphy's involvement "I feel like I've come close to winning the jackpot".[ref]
See the difference between trivia and encyclopedic content? Binksternet (talk) 20:26, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Distinguished Gentleman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exclusivity contract

[edit]

I seem to recall that Eddie Murphy had an exclusivity contract with Paramount from 1985-95, after Beverly Hills Cop became such a huge success. If so, how did Disney (through Hollywood Pictures) become able to release this film? MightyArms (talk) 20:51, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]