Talk:The Devil in Miss Jones

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Pornography Top‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The mention of the DVD at the beginning seems like an ad. I think it should be removed. noktulo 01:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jj ndmj.jpg

Image:Jj ndmj.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to New Devil in Miss Jones section and external links

I've added an external link at the bottom of the list. It's to a movie review in the New York Times Arts Section from 2005, now available online here. Durwoodie (talk) 07:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did further editing, inserting another external link and two references. The references need to be cleaned up. Durwoodie (talk) 08:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links again

I've trimmed back the linkfarm. devilmissjones.com is pure spam. The rest was a mix of redundancy, tangents, and promotion. --Ronz (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Devil in Miss Jones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091001081218/http://www.avnawards.com:80/index.php?content=pastwinners to http://www.avnawards.com/index.php?content=pastwinners

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wherefore "mockbuster"

The mere similarity of name to the 1941 Jean Arthur film does not appear to meet the criteria of the mockbuster article enough to justify the description in the distinguishing bit. There's no mention of plot similarity and the 22-year span between the two releases seems to disprove any suggestion this film was attempting to ride the release of the older. Without evidence the connection is mere coincidence, this would seem to merit removal. Czrisher (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]