Talk:The Death of Money

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Book instead of term

I don't think "death of money" is notable enough as a term to justify an article. (Feel free to prove me wrong, I might just not know about it.) However, this article could probably be converted readily into an article on Kurtzman's book, and cover the same ideas (probably without the OECD stuff). Thoughts? CRETOG8(t/c) 15:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He wrote a Harv Bus Rev article that explained the idea. I think it is a key idea/term and the book title happens to be the same. There may be a book called "quantum mechanics" and the term itself exists as well. The same here. In any case, the Wiki reader is not going to be more informed by leaps and bounds if the article changes to a book. Minor issue in my mind really. Cheers. History2007 (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm wondering how many other people picked up and ran with the expression, though. Is it a term in general use? If so, then that's fine for an article. If it's an idea he put forward in one book & article, then as an idea I don't think it's notable enough--particularly because colloquially, "death of money" could be taken as having lots of meanings. CRETOG8(t/c) 19:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reality: A minor argument not worth pursuing. There are so many huge errors to fix in Wikipedia, this is really beside the point. History2007 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then. I re-factored to be about the book. CRETOG8(t/c) 21:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The image on this page is not directly connected to the book.72.93.87.3 (talk) 12:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]