Talk:The Dark Knight Rises (soundtrack)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Comics: DC Comics / Batman Bottom‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Bottom

This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.
	This article is supported by Batman work group.

Merge into The Dark Knight Rises article.

I agree with user Typhoon966 that this soundtrack shouldn't exist on it's own page. It would fit in much better on the Dark Knight Rises article instead, perhaps under a "Soundtrack" section. People should consider merging the articles together. TheSameGuy (talk) 11:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they need to be merged. Films are allowed to have their own soundtrack articles, which the previous Nolan/Batman films have. This article could probably use expansion, though.--EclecticEnnui (talk) 03:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Descriptions

Somebody added "description" information on the track list containing MAJOR SPOILERS for the film. You have to click on the Edit button to see them (DON'T if you haven't seen the movie!), as the track list template cannot show it. I thought of turning them into "note1", "note2" etc., but I don't want to reveal the spoilers. --Wiz-Pro3 (talk) 00:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neater intro paragraph

Would anyone be averse to my moving the large quote concerning James Howard's absence to its own section, or shortening the quote (those interested could always follow the reference to the original quote elsewhere)? It dominates the article, which makes little sense -- it's an article about the piece of music, but seems to be mostly concerned with who didn't compose it than who did. Edictator (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]