Talk:The Cuckoo's Calling

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Fake?

A bunch of the JK Rowling and HP news sites are now retracting their articles because it was faked/hoaxed that Robert G. was JK Rowling just to get publicity. JK Rowling's publicist confirmed and issued a statement tonight.

as of now (14.07.2013, 07:41), both the BBC and The Independent maintained the stories, It also appeared on BBC Radio news bulletins. [1] [2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.45.156.90 (talk) 06:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Collection of reviews:

"Pre-reveal" (April - 13 July 2013)

Post-13 July

Pre and post is a great idea, why doesn't the reviews section split everything up into pre and post? 125.253.96.160 (talk) 04:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Print Runs

The entry only refers to initial sales of 1,500 copies. I have tried to find information on the initial print run, but to no avail. When I contacted the publishers, they replied saying that they would not give out the figure. Hence, how many copies of the first printing there are will remain a mystery. WoodyJoe (talk) 17:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date Rowling Revealed as Author

'Authorship' says 13 July 2013; 'Sales and Reception' says 14 July 2013. What is correct date? American In Brazil (talk) 00:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Sunday Times article is dated 14 July, but the reference in this entry is to a Daily Telegraph online article dated 13 July. As the Sunday papers are edited early, it appears that the Daily Telegraph reported on the revelation that day. I have amended the entry accordingly to reflect the Sunday Times date of 14 July, while acknowledging the earlier reporting. WoodyJoe (talk) 15:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cover

The cover currently shown does not match the cover found on the dust wrapper of the first printing, which features a quote by Val McDermid. The back cover features quotes by Mark Billingham and Alex Gray. Can someone find a high resolution image of the actual cover? WoodyJoe (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have just provided such an image which was the first I could find without pixelation in a Google image search.Tk420 (talk) 12:28, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel

The information contained in the live sequel section is both out of date and incomplete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.52.27 (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]