Talk:The Cost of Living (Lost)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Some sentences require footnotes following a direct quotation, per WP:MINREF.
The air date should be mentioned somewhere in the reception section, preferably with a reliable source.

Other than that, this looks pretty good; on hold. Quite a few books on the series discuss this episode, so I hope you'll be able to include these if you ever take this to FAC. 23W 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added the airdate and some extra refs. igordebraga ≠ 04:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good: I'll give this a pass. This would make for a good DYK entry, particularly about the Jackass Ginger set. 23W 04:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]