Talk:The Concert for Bangladesh/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Paul MacDermott (talk · contribs) 23:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- Article is well written and laid out.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- Very well-referenced with inline citations throughout the text. Stands up to a quick spotcheck of online references.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- The topic is broadly covered with relevant detail where necessary, covering the reasons why the concert was developed, issues surrounding the event itself, and a brief discussion of subsequent relevant events inspired by this one.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is well-balanced with no bias issues
- It is stable.
- No content disputes or edit wars. No problems with vandalism.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- No images at present, but that is ok for a GA. Not sure if any free use content is available, but this might need a few images if it went forward to FAC.
- Overall:
- Pass A very interesting and informative article about an early instance of pop music being used to raise public awareness of world issues. This is almost certainly worth a shot at FAC, as it has the length and detail to satisfy their criteria, and would make a good featured article. You may want to request a copy edit or peer review before submitting it for FAC, but I think it would stand a good chance there. Congratulations and good luck. Paul MacDermott (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, that's excellent news. I do have an image in mind actually, a photo of a sign from outside the MSG box office. (If I could just get my scanner to work properly ...) Cheers, JG66 (talk) 06:12, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Pass A very interesting and informative article about an early instance of pop music being used to raise public awareness of world issues. This is almost certainly worth a shot at FAC, as it has the length and detail to satisfy their criteria, and would make a good featured article. You may want to request a copy edit or peer review before submitting it for FAC, but I think it would stand a good chance there. Congratulations and good luck. Paul MacDermott (talk) 23:18, 18 November 2012 (UTC)