Talk:The Commies Are Coming, the Commies Are Coming

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Cold War on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles

Film: War / American

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Merge

Merged information from Red Nightmare & redirected it. SkierRMH 09:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paragraph removed from Remarks section

I removed the following paragraph from the Remarks section:

Though some feel the film has dated and is unintentionally funny, others feel that the loss of freedoms depicted in the film have come to pass although communism has ended. What remains is a well directed film showing attitudes of the time professionally performed by then well known actors.

This paragraph lacks citations and consists of pure opinions. People undoubtedly have a range of "feelings" about the film. Some may indeed find it "unintentionally funny" (although there is no citation indicating who feels this way), while others may find it disturbing or have other reactions to it. In any case, there's no need to guide the reader of this article about what feelings the film should evoke.

As for the notion that "the loss of freedoms depicted in the film have come to pass although communism has ended," it's not clear that anyone actually feels this way, and someone would have to be fairly stupid to actually believe this. The film depicts a scenario in which people's children are forcibly taken away from them to work on collective farms; religion has been abolished; and dissent is punished by trial without benefit of jury, followed by a death sentence. Does anyone who has a functioning brain seriously believe that these things are actually happening at present?

Finally, the claim that the film is "well directed" is POV, and the claim that it shows "attitudes of the time" implies that the attitudes reflected in the film were universally held, when in fact they were not.

--Sheldon Rampton (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, 'Attitudes of the time' means attitudes that could be found then that are less likely now. It does not have to imply that they were 'universally held'.

All the same, who could think that the Nightmare has come to pass?? I wonder about some people. 71.198.177.48 (talk) 20:24, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jack Kelly .jpg

The image Image:Jack Kelly .jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]