The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Simpsons, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to The Simpsons on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The SimpsonsWikipedia:WikiProject The SimpsonsTemplate:WikiProject The SimpsonsThe Simpsons articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia articles
Ya see, this Wikipedian clicks on "edit", and then confounds "visibly" (accurately perceptible by eye) with "merely apparent"/ "mere appearance", and a routine coincidence with "event worth construing as a occult foreshadowing of, or causal factor behind, a later event". We can report people documentable as pursuing conspiracy theories, but not single out pairs events that could be connected, without reliable studies involving calculations of the odds against mere chance producing comparable outcomes. --JerzyA (talk) 06:25, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Are talking about the scene in the episode where Lisa held up the brochure? In preparation of the article being Today's Featured Article for September 11th, I added text (backed by two citations) about the apparent reference to 9/11 Attacks. Having the text omitted from the article would harm its FA status. Since the apparent reference didn't take off until after the article reached FA status over a decade ago, its inclusion made the article more effective for the reader. The citations were not from some random Youtube account or Infowars, but from two, established newspapers which had conversations or mentioned the writers discussing the scene. I relied on guidance from Bart to the Future's article where it referenced a scene when Lisa mentioned the Donald Trump Administration. FunksBrother (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
