Talk:The Chrysanthemum and the Sword (Mad Men)

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Re: 'reception' section

If you read the Smith article carefully, what J. Smith called "awkward" and "cringe-worthy" had nothing to do with the show's reception, but of the actual plot, the actual story. Another way of looking at it would be that it was received well because the emotions elicited were equal to the emotions the show wished to elicit. The rest of the paragraph was very poorly written, so I'm removing it until someone can do better. Chris Weimer (talk) 04:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or, alternatively, you could try your hand at crafting a better paragraph, Chris. It isn't advisable to remove text that isn't demonstrably false. You've pointed out a problem with the paragraph; fix it, or leave it be, please. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh look, it's you. Read the article yourself. The paragraph is false. Chris Weimer (talk) 10:18, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, roll up yon sleeves and craft a better one. And, just as an aside - I know you are new and all, but you are going to want to be a lot more civil, if you expect to edit in Wikipedia with any amount of success. Be civil, or begone. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:30, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New? Son, you've got to be kidding me. And there's no need for a paragraph at all. The guy misunderstood the link, and made a shoddy article based on that. If *you* want to make a new paragraph from actual data, by all means do it, but keeping in LIES in preference to nothing at all is downright the sign of a terrible editor. Let's hope that's not you. Chris Weimer (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Note Concerning an External Link

I am writing about an addition I made to the external links for Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men which was automatically reverted by your bot. These links are from Kritik, the official weblog of the Unit for Criticism & Interpretive Theory, a recognized institute for cultural studies at the University of Illinois. The Unit for Criticism's multi-authored series of posts on Season 4 and Season 5 of Mad Men is the offshoot of a series of events including a symposium and Duke University Press book on the same topic. Each blog is authored by a recognized expert in cultural history, media studies and/or literary studies. Please do not remove this link as it does comply with Wikipedia policy and guidelines. We would be delighted to answer any questions you may have. 192.17.134.9 (talk) 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing about the addition above that was reverted again. We are not in violation of copyright issues. Please send us any questions you may have about the links we are making to the official weblog Kritik.128.174.194.84 (talk) 22:19, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]