Talk:The Case Against the Sexual Revolution

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

We have reviews in 4 large uk broadsheets. (See reviews section). She's been interviewed by the spectator (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQmzEAR-psc) a mainstream conservative magazine. And is in many different "alternative media" podcasts. Talpedia (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis

Here is the beginnings of a synopsis. We don't want this to be too long, since this this will hit into primary sourcing and length issues. But at the same time... it would be nice to have a summary and link Perry's work into the web of ideas. I might have to cut quite aggressively.

[DELETED since merged]

Talpedia (talk) 19:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I merged this into the article. Still too long. I don't know whether "mixing" reviews from newspapers that address the same points things in the book (but without the chapters numbers) is a good idea to make this all more verifiable and reduce the risk of me adding my own strong interpretation. Talpedia (talk) 13:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]