Talk:The Care and Keeping of You
Appearance
A fact from The Care and Keeping of You appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Links
[edit]https://www.al.com/living-news/2009/04/new_american_girl_book_calms_g.html
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the American Girl doll company published The Care and Keeping of You, a book explaining puberty, after receiving thousands of letters from children asking about it? Source: https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-the-american-girl-care-and-keeping-books-revolutionized-health-for-tweens-and-teens ("We got thousands of letters on health,” Barbara Stretchberry, the executive editor at American Girl, told The Daily Beast. “We’d been going through the mail and saw this trend of questions girls asked about their changing bodies")
- ALT1: ... that the American Girl doll company published The Care and Keeping of You to explain puberty because children kept asking them about it?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Kainé
Created by BuySomeApples (talk). Self-nominated at 09:00, 13 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Care and Keeping of You; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article is neutral, meets the required length, and is sufficiently referenced and free of copyvio. Created within seven days of this nomination. Hooks are interesting, succinct, and referenced; ALT1's phrasing is a bit more concise so that would be my choice. QPQ looks good. This is good to go! A fascinating topic—thank you for sharing. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Rhain: thanks for the review! This was an interesting page to write. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- I was interested in ALT0 - saw that it is sourced to The Daily Beast which is yellow on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. I imagine it is ok because it not controversial information. Bruxton (talk) 14:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Rhain: thanks for the review! This was an interesting page to write. BuySomeApples (talk) 07:38, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- B-Class children and young adult literature articles
- Low-importance children and young adult literature articles
- B-Class Women writers articles
- Mid-importance Women writers articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- WikiProject Women writers articles
- B-Class women's health articles
- Unknown-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles
- B-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles