Talk:The Cambridge Working Group
 | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Deletion Discussion
[edit]Oppose: the Boston Magazine and New York Magazin's mention of The Cambridge Working Group is not "in passing", as indicated by deletion tag inserted. It should be clear to the reader of those articles, that the The Cambridge Working Group is an integral part of the story they covered. Secondly, the shere number of scientists cosigned and their academic stature gives serious notability to this Consensus Statement. ScrupulousScribe (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Oppose:I searched for the article myself today after reading the above reference in New York magazine. It is useful to readers. Church of the Rain (talk) 16:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comingdeer, the deletion discussion page is here. ScrupulousScribe (talk) 17:12, 18 January 2021 (UTC)