Talk:The Cadre (newspaper)

Canada: Prince Edward Island Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Prince Edward Island.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

This article isn't very neutral. GreenJoe 19:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not neutral at all, and was in fact created and made with a number of sources and citations missing by user Adamfreeland. It was then disputed and I was given a warning for changing some of the very biased wording and some incorrect information. Some things, such as the fact that after the computer account at the administration building at UPEI that was linked to the removal of information from the UPEI wikipedia page was found to be a student and I apologized, was also removed with no reason given.

Is adamfreeland an administrator? If so, I have to question the validity of this entire page and the agenda behind his edits. There are still citations needed for the assumptions that are made on the page, as well as the fact that the UPEI student council voted to give a committee time to look into autonomy options, that was changed for no reason. There are citations available through council's voting and record-keeping, but at this point I hesitate to add any more information due to the obviously biased editing that is going on.

If anything, I think user Adamfreeland should be prevented from making any more changes to this stub until 3rd parties or proper citations can be found.

In fact, this Cadre stub went up only hours after the student council meeting to change the makeup of the committee and essentially turn down a bid by the Independent Student Media society to take over the newspaper. Through google searching I've linked the Adamfreeland account name with a student at UPEI, and with a little more googling have determined that it is in fact Ryan Palmer, president of the ISM society.

http://www.peiinfo.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=121764&highlight=#121764

By checking the various posts by user adamfreeland on this message board and others, I have determined that user Adamfreeland is involved with Radio@upei and ISM, and was one of only a few people from that program to go to the ECMA's this year. In that specific post, the user talks about going on holiday in Ottawa.

If you then check Ryan Palmer's blog, http://ryanpalmer.ca/home/ you'll see that he spent those same holidays in Ottawa.

It is obvious then that both myself and Adamfreeland should be prevented from making any more changes to the site, as there is a huge conflict of interest by both parties.

One last bit of checking the verify all this nonsense, a post on a message board for the artist K-OS has user 'Adamfreeland' stating that he is, in fact, Ryan Palmer from PEI.

http://k-os.forumsunlimited.com/lofiversion/index.php/t8050-50.html

Personally I think this whole stub should be deleted and a new one formed by a third party, using documented sources.

- Rob Walker, Editor in Chief RobpWalker —Preceding unsigned comment added by RobpWalker (talk • contribs)

The article also lacks sources for many things. A blog is not a verifiable source. GreenJoe 15:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This stub is completely one-sided and focuses almost entirely on the controversies of the past two years. There is very little here about the actual paper. 24.138.4.12 01:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Josh Lewis, Sports Editor[reply]

While this certainly isn't the most pressing issue with this article, I don't think that the first controversy occured in December 2002; that is, the date is incorrect. I was working as the A&E editor in Dec. 2002, the editor was Matt Stewart, and I don't remember him being replaced. Was it perhaps Dec. 2003, with editor Thomas Lloyd? I wasn't around for that, but I'd heard that there was some controversy with the Cadre that year.

132.206.5.144 (talk) 23:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Brodie MacRae[reply]

Oh wow. Did I stumble down a weird rabbit hole of my past. Yes all the controversy was when Lloyd was EiC in 2004, and we lost most of the staff and volunteers before he was sacked, and not because of a dispute over advertising. The offensive christmas article, the Mohammed cartoons, and inappropriate behaviour at volunteer meetings were all the tip of the iceberg. I was trying to find someone’s name from my first year at the Cadre in 2001 and then fell into this whole thread. Can’t believe this is on wiki.

-Marieve M. 24.224.222.62 (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:18, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]