Talk:The Boy Next Door (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wugapodes (talk · contribs) 04:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Will review Wugapodes (talk) 04:18, 2 March 2016 (UTC) Disclaimer: I'm a participant in the WikiCup, as is the nominator

Okay, waiting. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 11:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

If the comment is numbered, it must be addressed for the article to pass, if it is bulleted, it's an optional suggestion or comment that you don't need to act on right now.
When I quote things, you can use ctrl+f to search the page for the specific line I quoted.

1. "grossing over thirteen times its budget since being released" this should have a less relative reference, it should be something like "as of X" so that it doesn't become quickly outdated.

2. "Noah witnesses Claire on a date with Garrett" I first read this as if Noah and Garrett were on a date, you may want to reword it slightly.

3. "It runs for approximately 91 minutes" The infobox says 90, it should be consistent.

4. "nearly ten years ago" also slightly outdated, and should probably be referenced to the time of the film, not current day.

5. I would like to see a more robust fair use rationale. "Infobox" isn't a clear purpose, why does this purpose fall under fair use? Why isn't this replaceable by free media? Those answers should be added to the rationale at the page.

• The citations for the first edition Illiad sentence would benefit from citation bundling.

• I've addresses all issues, and I don't think we need a citation in the LEAD. I don't clearly understand the fifth issue, please elaborate it. Thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 04:08, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

• The fair use rationale for the movie poster in the infobox I think should be improved. For example, under "purpose" it only says "infobox". I believe the rationale should include why that usage falls under the Non-free content criteria policy. Under "replacable" it just says "no". Why can this image not be replaced and why must we use a non-free image. Wugapodes (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

• @Wugapodes: The fair use rationale is improved. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 11:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Results

On hold for 7 days pending revisions. Wugapodes (talk) 20:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Promoted Congrats on the good work, and I hope you continue to improve the encyclopedia! Wugapodes (talk) 18:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)