Talk:The Boxer (The Chemical Brothers song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAGUAR  17:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "It charted in Spain, Ireland and the US Dance Singles Sales chart" - It charted in Spain, Ireland and in the US Dance Singles Sales chart

   " was donated to Good for Nothing's 50/50 Make or Break in 2011" - it might be best to mention that Good for Nothing are a charity group here

   "It also had a one-week stay on the Spanish Albums Chart at number 17 in the week of July 31 and at number 15 on the Billboard's US " - already linked twice

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No original research found.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Good work. I couldn't find anything worthy enough to put this on hold, so I'll pass it now as it meets the criteria. JAGUAR  12:52, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Jaguar: Thank you so so much for reviewing my article. ♥ I wish you all the best. Beyoncetan (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)