Talk:The Book of Life (1998 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the Christian films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

David Walsh Review

I understand that there are larger issues with regard to the WSWS as a source and that those are being discussed on the Wikiproject:Film page and there is no reason to repeat that discussion. However, I saw in the revert history what seems to be a very strange remark, "it is difficult to decipher what this even means - tries to hard how? in the script? camerawork? direction of the actors?" Here is the section that was removed, less the reference:

David Walsh of the World Socialist Web Site gave the film a negative review, stating that "Hartley is looking to show off."

This strikes me as crystal-clear - but then again, I wrote it. Is anyone able to explain the problem to me? --Nixin06 (talk) 21:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]