Talk:The Boat Races 2015/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 22:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- A few quibbles.
- "The Autumn reception" Per MOS:SEASON, "autumn" should not be capitalised.
- "headstart" should "head start"
- "fightback" should be "fight back"
- "fightback" is okay in British English. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- "p.m" should be "p.m." or "pm" per MOS:TIME (multiple times)
- Made consistent to "p.m." The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- "Rachel Quarrell, the former Oxford cox" Link the first use of cox to Coxswain (rowing)
- Duplicated links: Boris Rankov, Molesey Boat Club (2), Goldie, stroke, Constantine Louloudis. Hammersmith Bridge, Barnes Bridge (2), out-rating, St Paul's School
- A few quibbles.
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
- All the links are good, a benefit of getting the article reviewed quickly
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- A fine, well-written account
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- All images appropriately tagged. A lot of good images by Pointillist and Katie Chan. Well done there!
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pretty good overall.
- Pass or Fail:
- Thanks for the review, much appreciated. I believe I've addressed your comments, but do let me know if there's anything else I can do. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Images and Good article criteria
[edit]Perhaps Hawkeye7 was just being courteous about images? Having uploaded mine to Commons as PD or CC-by-SA of course I've no right to object to en.wikipedia editors assessing them in context, whether or not I participated in how they were used. Nevertheless I want to make it crystal clear that I take no part in enwiki's somewhat incestuous Good article (GA), In the News (ITN) and Did you know (DYK) how boring we are processes. Scoring points that way has never been my motivation for improving articles, I promise. - Pointillist (talk) 23:01, 15 April 2015 (UTC)