Talk:The Boat Race 1927/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 97198 (talk · contribs) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Looks good – will do a thorough review later this evening. 97198 (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Very well written, concise and easy to understand.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All claims are referenced, and all references appear to be reliable sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   All main aspects of the race are covered in good detail. The background section is especially useful for non-fans.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No neutrality problems.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Good use of images, both of which are appropriately licensed.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Great work as usual. I made a few minor changes (feel free to revert any you disagree with) and I'm otherwise unable to fault anything in the article. GA it is! 97198 (talk) 10:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Nah, looks great. Thanks for the review, the tweaks and picking up on the error too! The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 17 February 2015 (UTC)