Jump to content

Talk:The Boat Race 1905/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 19:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    No copyvios detected.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    "...and he was replaced by novice P. H. Thomas, unfit having recently returned from Africa.[10]" - shouldn't this be "who was unfit, having recently returned from Africa?"--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Follows MOS standards.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    Has a well-formatted reference section.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
    Adequate citations to reliable sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    C. No original research:
    All content is verifiable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    No undue detail, the article is quite short, actually.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
    Stays focused on the subject.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Neutral, balanced presentation.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    The entire history consists of three edits, so yes, quite stable.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    One image is public domain, and the other is under Creative Commons.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
    Images are relevant with suitable captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Overall: Just one problematic sentence.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 18:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved. Pass.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Pass or Fail:

Thank you, I believe I've addressed your concern, but of course, let me know if there's anything else I can adjust. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All set.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:09, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]