This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rowing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rowing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RowingWikipedia:WikiProject RowingTemplate:WikiProject Rowingrowing articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
An "anonymous editor" (who is very familiar with a lot of my work) has removed links twice in a row, claiming them to be redundant. I can sort of see that argument, but actually linking in the lead and then once again in the main body seems like a very reasonable approach to me. Especially as the article will be expanded further in the future and the linked items may move further and further away from their first links in the lead. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:03, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Very reasoable aproach?.. What does MoS say about this? And about owning an article? The next time I will be reminding you that you cannot be claimant and judge at the same time. (I feel like you are planning to block someone simply because you don't like others to row in your river...) --176.239.19.182 (talk) 21:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please direct me to the "rule" you are imposing? As you already know, MoS says nothing about article ownership as MoS is about styles of article, not editorial behaviour. And please, just log in to your account, that way you can move the page you wish to move and we can all re-discover who you are, instead of hiding behind an IP. The Rambling Man (talk) 05:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No, stupid discussion is one where you claim some kind of "rule" and quote "MoS" but then fail to prove any of it. Please feel free to log in to your account, by the way, to stop hiding behind this IP anonymity. What are you trying to hide? Are you a banned editor? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The linking disputed above has been accepted in around 160 articles, including 3 featured articles. I'm waiting for the IP to provide something other than his own opinion on this. Per WP:BRD I reverted his edit and initiated discussion. Since then, the IP has just continually reverted my edit with no substantiation of the "rule" he claims exists. I will leave it a couple of weeks to see if any other consensus can be formed, but then I will restore the version that was considered a good article which is inline with other featured articles of a similar nature. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:42, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
