Jump to content

Talk:The Blank Book

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What are the "hints"?

Not a part of the actual series?

[edit]

Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series
Not a part of the actual series

Okay, okay, we get the idea. It's not a part of the actual series.

So lose the box! TheMadBaron 19:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler tag

[edit]

Do we really need a spoiler tag? I honestly don't think that anything relating to the plot of the series could be given away by the note. Can we remove the spoiler tag? Amphion 22:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone just moved it. Orthologist

Fair use rationale for Image:BlankBook.PNG

[edit]

Image:BlankBook.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]