Talk:The Black Parade Is Dead!

Release date?

So when is it again? Because the article now says it's coming out in June. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.37.71.137 (talk) 03:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

From what I've heard it's coming out June 24, but I don't have a source for that. Amazon UK says it's coming out June 30, so for the US June 24 seems reasonable. 76.93.136.62 (talk) 16:19, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

I believe Warner Bros. sent out an email saying it will be out on June 24.  Orfen ^{User Talk} | _Contribs 00:43, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

"Death Wish"

It has come to my attention that track 13 It's not a fashion statement, It's a deathwish, may not be on the dvd, and that the track list on the official page which entitles track 13 as "Death Wish" is actually what the fans call "Stay". First of all, all the tracks on the track list are formally written, so why would they shorten the full name as "Death Wish"? I think maybe it's wrong, but I have no proposal to what we should do about it. Blkeddie! (talk) 12:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I believe the track in question is in fact "It's Not a Fashion Statement, It's a Deathwish". I do not think "Stay" will be included on the DVD unless it will go without a title as Gerard stated he will not be giving it one yet. If you a referring to the post here it is stated lower down that "Death Wish" is usually how they abreviate "It's Not a Fashion Statement, It's a Deathwish". I have seen the song abbreviated as "Death Wish" before and don't think it is the song "Stay".  Orfen ^{User Talk} | _Contribs 20:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Same here, I think its just an abreviation. – Zntrip 22:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Blkeddie!, I think you're right. As I said on MCR discussion, this title is different from "Deathwish", wich is the short form for the song "It's not a fashion statement, it's a fucking deathwish".

They said that Hoboken concert will appear completely (look here), and they played "Stay" right in the moment it was set to play a song called "Death wish". Search for videos of that show: Could you find the song It's not a fashion statement, it's a fucking deathwish? No... you will only find what people before called Stay

Find out before talking... --Moraleh (talk) 21:10, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

As noted in this review the setlist includes "It's Not A Fasion Statement, It's a Deathwish" or "Deathwish" and a "new song".  Orfen ^{User Talk} | _Contribs 02:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I still think we should assume that the song is "It's Not a Fasion Statement, It's a Deathwish". When the album comes out, we'll know for sure. – Zntrip 04:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll assume it's "It's Not a Fasion Statement, It's a Deathwish". But I think that the name on the page should list it as "Death Wish", just in case of an inaccuracy. Blkeddie! (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Me too, and I changed the name to "Death wish". Though I think it's the same than Stay, I won't add anything about it, because of the differences of opinions. --Moraleh (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

I think it may be "It's Not a Fasion Statement, It's a Deathwish", because it also says on the listings "I'm Not Okay" as "I'm Not Not Okay." 12.37.71.167 (talk) 02:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

The new My Chemical Romance website for the UK has a song called "untitled", so that might be the song known as "Stay". By the way, the track listing is different on the MCR UK website, so should that be put up here too? --76.93.136.62 (talk) 22:43, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

This is a good point. While I don't think the entire track listing should be added again perhaps "It's Not a Fasion Statement, It's a Deathwish" should have the full title listed along with the song Untitled listed. The UK website was just created so I'd think that track listing would be more accurate.  Orfen  ^T • _C 04:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect article title.

The title should be "The Black Parade is Dead!", that is, without the capital I in "is". That's how it's called on the official website, and that's how it's grammatically correct. Someone move, please. Litis (talk) 13:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums#Capitalization

Though it's true that about the official page. I don't know... --Moraleh (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Track Listings

Okay, so apparently there's a new site http://www.mychemicalromance.co.uk that has another track listing different than the one seen before. Well it's a UK site, so couldn't this mean that US and UK versions of the album have different track listings? On that note, they have the release date for June 30, on that site, so I think that just may be for the UK release. 12.37.71.142 (talk) 03:33, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

The release date is different but usually concert DVDs aren't region specific which would mean both DVDs have the same content and could play on DVD players of different regions. I don't think there is anything to suggest there would be two different versions of the DVD besides the different track listings on the two websites. The track listing is listed as the track listing for the DVD The Black Parade Is Dead so I don't think there is going to be two different DVDs. The one on the American website has some errors even listing a song as "I'm Not Not Okay". Either way the track listing on both websites is from the label itself making it official and I suggest using the one off the UK website since it is more recent and doesn't contain those errors. I think it'd more accurately reflect the end result.  Orfen  ^T • _C 04:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Leak

I'm adding on to the article to mention that the CD has been leaked onto various torrent sites as of June 25. 66.194.108.102 (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

The above comment was me, by the way.

I forgot to log in. Deadxsouls (talk) 21:10, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

I thank you for this, but its not notable, yet. WP:ALBUM#LEAK Jakisbak (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

ok, Sorry about that.

Didn't realize there was a notability issue with album leaks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deadxsouls (talk • contribs) 04:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I just found out that MCR released the entire album on their myspace. I noticed on the Rotation album page that was considered notable, so would this fall under the same notability.? Deadxsouls (talk) 04:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I doubt it, unless someone has said something about it it shouldn't be included. Its one think that annoys me quite a lot lol. Although its quite useful sometimes. Jakisbak (talk) 09:39, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it is notable... We put the date "1 July 2008", but people can already listen it, and it's not leaked, the band uploaded it... I would include it --Moraleh (talk) 01:38, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

It's tricky. It says that it's usually not notable unless "directly responded to by the musical artist or their management, or the leak itself receiving broad media coverage." While they did leak it themselves on their Myspace, they have no news of it on their website. They don't even have an announcement on their Myspace saying it's leaked or any information about it. However, I think the band leaking the album themselves would be a case of them responding to it. The style guideline also has the word "usually".  Orfen  ^T • _C 04:56, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Goofs

During Mama in Mexico City on the clean version, instead of cencoring fuck, it cencored gun and left it un-touched. Why? Girdog (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

...the title of your section is your answer--Jakezing (talk) 01:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Refused?

Any indication from the band that the title is an allusion to the band REFUSED? Their tour documentary DVD - as well as one of there songs is entitled REFUSED ARE FUCKING DEAD