Talk:The Black Jacobins

	Haiti portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Haiti, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Haiti-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HaitiWikipedia:WikiProject HaitiTemplate:WikiProject HaitiHaiti articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Trinidad and Tobago Low‑importance

	Trinidad and Tobago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trinidad and Tobago, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the country of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.Trinidad and TobagoWikipedia:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTemplate:WikiProject Trinidad and TobagoTrinidad and Tobago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have included that James is a self taught historian. Additionally,I removed where its says this book is "THE authoritative text" on the Haitian Revolution, as there are many texts on the event. I also removed the part that says that criticisms of the accuracy of the book have not been validated. Several history Professors have shown where James' bias has come to conflict with the facts. I am currently studying history at the PhD level. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.26.92.116 (talk) 22:25, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

I am not knowledgeable on this subject, so I shall refrain from edits, but I noticed quickly that the writing carries a distinctly socialist or Marxist slant. I appreciate the hard work done by the person or persons who have contributed to the article, but find that the Marxist outlook materially affects the conclusions drawn by the author, in what at times is a book review. I am not sure if that is normal for an article on a book, but it feels somewhat off.

Haakondahl (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with your initial self-assessment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.3.198.150 (talk) 09:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]