Talk:The Bishop Revival/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 18:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- Prose is grand. I would change references to "the week's villain" to "the episode's villain", as the episode exists outside of its original broadcast. The main image's caption also seems overly long, so I'd probably lose the last sentence in it. I'd also avoid easter egg links, so change " last seen in a first season episode" to "last seen in the first season episode "Ability"".
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- MOS is grand. I'd retitle "Music and cultural references" to just "Cultural references" though - classical music is still culture, even if it's not modern pop culture.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Citations are grand, no problem there.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Scope is just right, not too much or too little.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutrality is grand.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Stability is fine.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Image is tagged appropriately.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Image is used well, though, as mentioned above, caption is a bit on the long side. for it being an infobox.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Article seems all set to go, so I'm going to go ahead and pass this as a Good Article.
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you very much! :) Ruby2010 comment! 03:53, 31 July 2011 (UTC)