Talk:The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Bb&m.jpg

Image:Bb&m.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Needs chart performance and certifications

Fantailfan (talk) 15:33, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Fantailfan (talk) 13:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My copy of The Birds, the Bees and the Monkees

Hey, does anyone know about some releases of 'The Monkees: Original Album Series'? Because with my copy of 'the Birds, the Bees and the Monkees', the 16th track 'The Girl I Left Behind Me' cuts off at '0:59' and at '1:00' the song 'Dream World' (which was already featured at the start of the album begins) starts where the rest of 'The Girl I Left Behind Me' should have been.

The song's running time is '2:40' as usual and when that happens, 'Dream World' continues into what should have been 'Lady's Baby'. At '1:38' 'Dream World' finishes and at '1:41' 'Auntie's Municipal Court' begins but it cuts off pre-maturely at '2:29' which was where 'Lady's Baby' should have ended.

It's okay, I wasn't angry, nor did I feel cheated.

(The original album series was extremely cheap for a five disc set - a pretty good bargain, and although the engineers didn't bother to clean up all the glitches, the quality was remarkable).

In any case I downloaded infinetely superior copies of 'The Girl I Left Behind Me' and 'Lady's Baby' from an online copy of 'The Birds, the Bees and the Monkees' and burned them and the 15 other songs I already had on to a disc as a second copy of the album (I kept the master of course).

But does anyone else know anything about this quirk? -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 09:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

According to Wikipedia article guidelines, this article should be at The Birds, the Bees & the Monkees. 128.151.71.16 (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Birds, The Bees & The Monkees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100212112129/http://www.rhino.com/shop/product/the-monkees-the-birds-the-bees-the-monkees-boxed-set to http://www.rhino.com/shop/product/the-monkees-the-birds-the-bees-the-monkees-boxed-set

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Yielding"

Technically speaking, the LP did not "yield" Daydream Believer, since the single was out several months previous to it. Someone more industrious than I might want to figure out how to rephrase that piece of info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.74.170 (talk) 04:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I agree that rewording it would be better than removing it since it is valid information. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 04:29, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Banner about style, Why?

Since March 2012 a banner above the article states thus:

  "This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style.  (March 2012)"

Why, for 14 years has this been here, and what exactly is the offending information? I think the article could be expanded to learn more about intimate particulars of the production and marketing of the LP. For example, a limited run of mono pressings were made in the US that now command high prices. More information can be found around the web about this. Why just a blurb in the Wiki? The story about this record could take up an entire book. Without deleting the interesting stories about the record presented now, this could and should be a 'Good' class article if someone wanted to devote the time to it. StyxinConn47 (talk) 15:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]