Talk:The Betrayal

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / Seinfeld

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Seinfeld task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

Perhaps the plot should be in forward chronological order, with sections to indicate the order in which they are seen in the episode? 174.50.210.156 (talk) 22:39, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Continuity

On 24 October 2011, someone added a line saying "Vegtable Lasagna aka Magnus" appeared in an earlier episode. Who or what is Vegtable Lasagna, besides being misspelled? Is it an animal? Article vandalism? 184.98.115.101 (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only subject

Betrayal (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 02:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Betrayal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081216150839/http://www.sonypictures.com/tv/shows/seinfeld/episode_guide/?sl=episode&ep=908 to http://www.sonypictures.com/tv/shows/seinfeld/episode_guide/?sl=episode&ep=908

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:31, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

production section says - "an opening shot of Kramer's gravestone", but there is no shot of Kramer's gravestone

Why does production section say "an opening shot of Kramer's gravestone". There is no scene showing Kramer's gravestone in the episode at all.

A ticket for Nina? Why?

These two (users Martin IIIa and Jauerback) think it’s «less clear» and «confusing» to leave this matter unexplained, contra the episode writers themselves (see diff). Tuvalkin (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you reject the episode's own explanation that she bought the tickets just to further annoy Mary Sue Ellen with some companions, you might as well ask why she would buy a ticket for anyone, since she had been reliably informed that India is an awful place to visit and was only going there to spite Mary Sue Ellen. Either way, a ticket for Nina makes as much sense as a ticket for Kramer. Martin IIIa (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Martin's explanation is spot on, but I also had an issue with the (FDR’s curse, see below) part. How is this not confusing? So, now the reader needs to skip ahead and "see below" in the plot summary to understand what's meant by FDR's curse? Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]