Talk:The Best Man (1964 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Plot

The last sentence in the Plot section reads: "It puts an end to both their chances, but unites the party around an electable candidate." This is true but misses the point. The title of the film is pointedly ironic, and this is characterized by the text at the top of the film's poster. The candidate that finally gets the nomination is weak - clearly not the best man. Gore Vidal's point is that our electoral system makes it impossible, or at least improbably, to select the best man and we end up with "an electable candidate" instead. The poisons that Vidal identifies are character assassination (personal attacks, ad hominem, etc.) and the unfortunate publicly accepted notion that a candidate cannot have any flaws. Every great man has flaws. Our system filters them out.

Perhaps a better wording of the last line might be: "It puts an end to both their chances, but unites the party around an electable candidate, but most certainly not "The Best Man." Menomena 9 (talk) 23:22, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]