Jump to content

Talk:The Beginning (The X-Files)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 15:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will review soon. Ruby 2010/2013 15:50, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • No need for the Vancouver link (see WP:OVERLINK). Same for Los Angeles, California, United States, United Kingdom, and Ireland
  • Why the quotes when mentioned the feature film?
  • it's -> it is; doesn't -> does not (don't use contractions)
  • Who is The Black-Haired Man? Is there a relevent wikilink for him? Add the actor's name?
  • Indeed, the very first shot of the episode—a long look into the sun was—intended by Carter to "boldly announce the show's arrival in Southern California." -?> Indeed, the very first shot of the episode—a long look into the sun—was intended by Carter to "boldly announce the show's arrival in Southern California.
  • new co-Executive Producer -> new co-executive producer
  • Wikilink David Duvhovny in pre-production section
  • Make sure the first mention of Spotnitz includes his name and a wikilink in production section
  • the writers sought... the writers sought (needs switching up)
  • No need to say Carter is the series creator twice; also avoid wikilinking him more than once in the article body
  • Wikilink to Southern California Edison
  • The episode was the second highest rated episode of the sixth season Removed bolded (or input "The Beginning")
  • "The episode received mixed-to-negative reviews from critics, ranging from largely positive to negative". I think this statement could be written differently. Maybe "Critical reception to the episode was divided, as reviews ranged from largely positive to negative"
  • Remove that X-Files link in reception section (I think it's already linked plenty above!)

I'll place the review on hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 22:40, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I believe I've addresses all the concerns. Thanks a ton for reviewing this article!--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Made some of the unresolved edits myself. Looks good, passing for GA. Nice work, Ruby 2010/2013 20:00, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]