Talk:The Bees Army

A fact from The Bees Army appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that The Bees Army, a Saudi opposition movement, was supported by Jamal Khashoggi?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Bees Army.

Wikipedia

Saudi Arabia Mid‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 17:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that The Bees Army is a Saudi opposition movement which was supported by Jamal Khashoggi? Source: "Khashoggi funded the first batches of sim cards, which Abdulaziz distributed. That was the moment – fatal as it turned out – Abdulaziz says, when Khashoggi understood that he had crossed over the line from journalist to activist."[1]

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Temagami River

Created by Mhhossein (talk). Self-nominated at 12:54, 30 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Comments by Tbhotch

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy compliance:

Adequate sourcing:
Neutral:
Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

Cited:
Interesting:
Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: A new article that is long-enough. It is well-sourced, neutral and it receives a "Violation Unlikely 30.6%" at Earwig's, but its just the quotes. The hook is interesting and the QPQ was performed correctly. Good to go. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 04:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To T:DYK/P6