Talk:The Baylor Lariat
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 17 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olivia mohney1. Peer reviewers: Jillianbowers.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]Oppose. The idea should be to expand on notable topics, rather than merge/delete them. Otherwise, we could just simply get rid of all the stubs by combining them with closely-related articles. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- delete or merge. University papers are not inherently notable and require reliable sources like any other article. This is currently an unsourced one line article. Nuttah (talk) 22:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Unsourced, one-line articles can be considered notable and allowed to remain so they can be expanded. →Wordbuilder (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- That article has an external link discussing the subject, by either way WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant. Nuttah (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- That article's link to a blog made it notable? Please direct me to the Wikipedia guideline or policy stating that inserting an external link to a blog helps establish notability. Thanks! →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant, we are discussing this article. Nuttah (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Either way, the Baylor University article is already bigger than the ideal size. Merging this article will only make it worse. →Wordbuilder (talk) 16:12, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant, we are discussing this article. Nuttah (talk) 07:29, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- That article's link to a blog made it notable? Please direct me to the Wikipedia guideline or policy stating that inserting an external link to a blog helps establish notability. Thanks! →Wordbuilder (talk) 14:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- That article has an external link discussing the subject, by either way WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is irrelevant. Nuttah (talk) 05:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comment. Unsourced, one-line articles can be considered notable and allowed to remain so they can be expanded. →Wordbuilder (talk) 23:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Nearly seven weeks has passed and there is no consensus to merge the article, so I am removing the template. →Wordbuilder (talk) 21:00, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles
- Stub-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Texas articles
- Low-importance Texas articles
- WikiProject Texas articles
- WikiProject United States articles