Talk:The Baltimore Examiner

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Add to this page

Please help add information about this newspaper. I just created the page and put some basic information in because it's an entirely separate newspaper from its sister paper in D.C. (and it is much more widely read). It has matched and even surpassed the Sun's circulation, so that in itself must make it worthy of its own article.

But I really don't know much else about this paper. So if someone could continue adding information, that would be nice.

Criticism

With the issues raised in the section sound legit, it reads more like rant and complaint then a criticism. Also their is the issue that their are no citations either. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 08:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Springboarding off of Boothy443's question, the use of 'was' makes the Baltimore Examiner sound extinct, since the author does not provide any method, time or date of its death. It is found nowhere else.

I am more interested in whether or not the B.E. is a valid news source. The current author definately has bias.

Out them, if wrong. Substantiate them, if right.

Be true to yourself and to truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jandrewfoster (talk • contribs) 02:51, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The Baltimore Post-Examiner" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Baltimore Post-Examiner. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 20#The Baltimore Post-Examiner until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]