Talk:The Awakening (1980 film)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]Christina Coculuzzi 15:36, 29 March 2012 (UTC)== editing points ==
Your article is a good start, it could use further details on adaptations of the films and other films that relate. Also, you could discuss other controversies related to the movie if there is any available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bonesgirl206 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Rehansen 17:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC) == editing points ==
I made a few corrections, but overall the article seemed to be well structured and got the point across. I'll check it again but it seems fine to me. Interesting sounding film. User:Rehansen
- I've seen it, it's boring as hell!81.111.126.82 (talk) 12:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
I rephrased parts of the beginning, and did some grammatical changes. This seems like an exciting movie. This article could benefit if there were any press film-ratings included in this article.
-Hannah Sim 18:21, 29 March 2012
- Be very grateful you have never seen this film it is 101 minutes of drawn out tedium!!81.111.126.82 (talk) 12:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Impact of recent student edits
[edit]This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course. As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article. Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work. If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further. If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
- 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
- 1 - A few minutes of work needed
- 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
- 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
- 4 - More than an hour of work needed
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment
[edit]This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Mount Allison University supported by Anthropology and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class British cinema articles
- British cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Start-Class Egypt articles
- Low-importance Egypt articles
- WikiProject Egypt articles
- Start-Class horror articles
- Low-importance horror articles
- WikiProject Horror articles
- Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2012 Q1