Talk:Aviation Special Interest Group

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 February 2013. The result of the discussion was keep.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (The article refers to the world's oldest continuously-operated online forum.) --AlphaVictorSierraIndiaGolf (talk) 21:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SANDBox for AVSIG

Folks,

I have started a sandbox page for AVISIG. So in the next couple of weeks, we will have a proper article that the adm. will not object to. I hope. I have been on Wiki for several years, and wrote several articles and edited hundreds others, but never had a speedy deletion (I am told that is because I work them up in sandboxes first). Anyone know the rule on deletion? Is the adm. decision final? Inquiring minds want to know.

Jack E. Hammond

Afd

Unfortunately, in my view, this is article is up for deletion because an editor felt it might be eligble for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. All editors are welcome to share their thoughts on the matter at this article's entry: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Aviation Special Interest Group (AVSIG)

In addition to adding my view that the article should be kept I have added some references to the article itself and added it to the deletion sorting thing to solicit a more informed audience for the debate Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Aviation.

Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 13:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Links from Other Articles

I added a couple of links to this article, in the CompuServe article, and in the List of Internet forums article. Is that sufficient to deal with the 'orphan' tag?--Palmpilot900 (talk) 03:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]