Talk:The Ashes of Eden

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels: Sci-fi Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Science fiction task force.

Factual Error

The statement "The audio adaptation of the book is notable as the first time in the entire Star Trek franchise that the famous phrase "Beam me up, Scotty" is uttered in that form." is simply untrue. Several novels and comics have used the phrase long before The Ashes of Eden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.149.12 (talk) 14:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Needed

This article contains a lot of bizarre grammatical constructions. For example, "the response was positive and wanted to know if a sequel was possible" makes absolutely no sense. Competent editing is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.149.12 (talk) 03:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Still contains form data that has not been replaced with real information. EdJohnston 13:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps reducing this down to a stub would be the best solution? shotwell 02:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well we shouldn't let something sit around for months with placeholders in it. Has anyone read this book? It might only take a few minutes to fill in the missing details. EdJohnston 03:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I meant to delete all of the placeholders, copy-edit the existing content, and call it a stub. shotwell 05:25, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds OK to me. EdJohnston 13:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I found some information to fill in and also correct. There were multiple authors, a different publisher for the hardcover edition, etc. Shatner is probably pissed now because he isn't getting all the credit. Do you think the clean-up tag should be removed? shotwell 15:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Ashes of Eden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070102124243/http://www.well.com/~sjroby/lcars/1995.html to http://www.well.com/~sjroby/lcars/1995.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]