Talk:The Amazing Race Canada 6

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian television.

Television: The Amazing Race / Reality Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Amazing Race task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Reality television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pitstarts

Pitsarts that are different from the pitstop location, regardless of whether they have been mentioned by the host, have always been included in other TAR WPs. For example, on the TARC 5 WP, Jon never mentioned the Siam@Siam Design Hotel during leg 6 but it is still included. So, why is including the two pitstarts of TARC 6 considered disruptive editing? "Per [1] 'Plot sections should summarize [], but not offer a scene-by-scene sequence of everything that happens, or attempt to evaluate, interpret or analyze it.'" Teams are not starting in the same place that they finished the leg, so that is a summarization. I'm not asking to include the nearby parking lot where teams drove their trucks to Dawson City Airport, that would be considered a scene-by-scene sequence. Xoruz (talk) 03:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its disruptive editing as it violates WP:MOS guidelines and policy. Also, please read Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:37, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]