Talk:The Altar and the Door/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 04:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
[edit]- Information in body of article needed to support the genre of the album
- Changed to the body-supported 'Rock' and 'pop rock' genres.
Lead
[edit]- ...experience looking at the MySpace pages of his youth ministry students. → Wiki-link "MySpace"
Background and recording
[edit]- No issues
Composition
[edit]- No issues
Critical reception and accolades
[edit]- No issues
Release and sales
[edit]- No issues
Singles
[edit]- No issues
Track listing
[edit]- No issues
Credits and personnel
[edit]- No issues
Charts and certifications
[edit]- Put information into actual subsections
- Not sure if information in "Chart precession and succession" should be in a collapsed table
References
[edit]- No issues
After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues which you believe do not concern good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 (talk2me) 17:57, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing both articles. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC)