Talk:The Adventures of Spunky and Tadpole
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of The Adventures of Spunky and Tadpole be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Ultra-chintzy? Perhaps...
[edit]I well recall this peculiar little cartoon, and was fascinated by it. I agree with Hal Erickson that it was “[u]ltra-chintzy both in concept and execution…” But that’s what makes it such fine retro viewing.
As far as storytelling goes, I find it superior to the [Hanna Barbera] productions [Ruff and Reddy] and [Huckleberry Hound]; far more imaginative and whimsical, and not cynical. And not an take-off on Jimmy Durante or Jackie Gleason (Ralph Cramden and The Honeymooners).
Is it really “chintzier” visually than, say, Fractured Fairy Tales, from the [Rocky and Bullwinkle Show]?--Mysweetoldetc. 19:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysweetoldetc. (talk • contribs)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- Stub-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class American animation articles
- Low-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- Stub-Class Animated television articles
- Unknown-importance Animated television articles
- Animated television work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Stub-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Wikipedia requested images of American television topics