Talk:The Actor and the Rube
Appearance
The Actor and the Rube has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: February 4, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Extra
[edit]More mentions that are not unique or special enough to give credit otherwise:
This is more for the person interested in tracking down the viewing releases. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Actor and the Rube/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 12:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Time for another review.
Lead section
- "The plot of the film has a cranky farmer, disliked by his entire town, head to New York." Suggest rewriting to: "The plot of the film is about a cranky farmer, who, disliked by his entire town, decides to head to New York"
- "and was also released in Britain under the alternate title" I would suggest changing Britain to United Kingdom.
- "with the New York Clipper finding it a welcome relief from the "pie-smashing" antics of other comedies." I suggest linking "pie-smashing" under low comedy.
Plot
- I noticed you linked New York in this section but not in the lead.
Reception and legacy
- I suggest changing the title of this section to "Release and reception"
- Any reason why the film is lost?
References
- Link the publishers of these sources if possible.
Placing it on hold for now. I will promote once the issues above are addressed. good888 (talk) 15:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Good888: - Fixes done. To answer your questions "pie-smashing" to low comedy results in a surprise link and the reference is likely to actual pie-smashing. The film is presumed lost, but there is no single reason for these being lost and I cannot cite anything direct for this. Thanks for reviewing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nice job once again. Promoting to GA class. good888 (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- @Good888: - Fixes done. To answer your questions "pie-smashing" to low comedy results in a surprise link and the reference is likely to actual pie-smashing. The film is presumed lost, but there is no single reason for these being lost and I cannot cite anything direct for this. Thanks for reviewing. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)