Talk:Thapa dynasty
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Renaming
[edit]they are not dynasty? please move it to the Thapa Regime — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.27.248.221 (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 13 May 2017
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) - Yashovardhan (talk) 16:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Thapa dynasty → Thapa aristocratic family – Since the family didn't rule sequentially, it doesn't qualify as dynasty. It is rather an aristocratic family. Airkeeper (talk) 05:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC) Airkeeper (talk) 05:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I think they would be commonly accepted as a dynasty. —A L T E R C A R I ✍ 11:11, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
I agree to Altercari. I would like to close this discussion any soon. Airkeeper (talk) 15:50, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Good Article
[edit]This currently has a copy edit tag on it. This can not be a good article while that tag remains. It is currently a candidate for an immediate fail if this is not resolved. AIRcorn (talk) 03:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)