Talk:Thank You Girl

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thank You Girl article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

The Beatles Low‑importance

This Beatles-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.The BeatlesWikipedia:WikiProject The BeatlesTemplate:WikiProject The BeatlesThe Beatles articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia.

To-do list:

For WikiProject The Beatles

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles.
Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article
Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs
Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood.
Verify : Beatle wives
Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Untitled

This article has been kept following this VFD-debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:56, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Separate sections by Lennon and McCartney

The paragraph about the composition of this song makes several claims that I take issue with, at least until persuasive evidence is presented. First of all, I've never heard any story - nor is any reference provided - that different parts of this song were composed by the individual writers. Second, it refers to the verses being written by one (which one?) and the chorus by the other (which one?), but what about the bridge? If anything, there's a different "feel" between the verse/chorus and the bridge, but that doesn't persuade me. Third, the notion that the distinction between the two writing styles is evident is decidedly NPOV. I'm going to give this a couple of weeks, and if no one else addresses this or persuades me I'm wrong (which anyone is more than welcome to do), I'm going to delete or radically alter that section. MicroProf 21:14, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FromMetoYou522.jpg

Image:FromMetoYou522.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Objection to "Personnel per"

I recall "per" meaning "through, along or over" from my Latin days. Anyway, the expression "Personnel per" on this page and on the "From Me To You" page, does not sit right with me. It intrudes into the Personnel section, it's pretentious and possibly just wrong. I suggest replacing it with "(source: xxx)" plus the numbered link to reference. If someone agrees, please change it (I won't based on my opinion alone, because I'm an idiot, but two idiots could be quorate). Love, Fido x — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.62.29 (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]