Talk:Thalassoma bifasciatum

Peer Review

Hi there, I see you’ve expanded this article significantly. There are a few edits that I made to your wiki article. I hyperlinked the scientific terms that may be hard for the lay reader to understand, and I added more headings to your article to break up large chunks of texts. Note that once you hit three headings a table of contents is generated. Also, I have not come around to doing this, but you should make sure you have the appropriate in-line citations for your article. It seems that you have plenty of references, but it is still hard to figure out which reference article refers to which segment you have written. I think that your grammar and neutral style are very reflective of the kind of encyclopedic content Wikipedia strives to have. GenesBrainsBehaviorNeuroscienceKL (talk) 08:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I also edited and added some more information to your page. This is a great detailed start. The information was very detailed and in large chunks, so I divided up the article and added more clarifying information.This makes it easier for the reader to find certain topics, rather than reading many lengthy paragraphs. According to the set up of other Good Articles, I added more topics to create a more well-rounded article as well. Sections like Habitat, Diet, Social Systems, etc were added. As the previous comment has stated, you have a lot of great references, but no in-line citations. There is a lot of detailed information, so in-line citations are needed. Gseehra123 (talk) 8:41 PM, 26 September 2013 —Preceding undated comment added 01:42, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Washington University supported by the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Fall term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]