Talk:Thakur (title)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

India: Bihar / Jammu and Kashmir / Rajasthan / History Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Bihar (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Rajasthan (assessed as High-importance).

This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Sociology

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I was just going to make a request for this article, so thanks for writing it, I didn't know enough and couldn't find enough to create one. This term came up fairly prominently in Bandit Queen where the "bad guys" were higher caste Thakurs. We should also mention it is commonly taken as an appelation. Search Wikipedia for Thakur and you'll see several instances come up. Also Tagore is the Bengali equivalent/spelling as given in Platts.[1] That also gives the spelling as ठाकुर which transliterates as ṭhākur or Thākur instead of Thakore, so perhaps wee should move it to that. Platts is public domain so we can use anything from that. That's the only source I could find though. I could never get the spelling right before to find it. - Taxman ^Talk 18:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was page moved by Ronhjones (talk · contribs) at 22:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC) — æk ^Talk 06:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thakore → Thakur — Most appropriate and commonly used term. Just did a google search and found 2.29 million hits against 0.1 million for Thakore. Even in the article itself, the term is spelled "Thakur". Thakore is very rarely used and I haven't find any one addressed as such so far. —Axxn (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree per nom. Airplaneman ^talk 02:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable. Taxman's post suggests this is a nineteenth-century spelling, like Hindoo. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 14:52, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Kolis as Thakur

Hi Мастер Шторм, it is regarding this edit. The citation added by the IP here has a list of people bearing the title "Thakur" and surname "Koli", however at the same time they are declared belonging to various Rajput castes. DO Rajputs have 'Koli' as a surname or are these people are actually Kolis that claim Rajput status as explained here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fylindfotberserk. I just looked at the book details (publisher, year, etc.) at Thakur (title)#References and I believe that I won't spend a moment looking inside the book for WP:V. Is the citation provided acceptable as a source? No, it isn't! British era caste compendiums are not reliable sources, as discussed several times at WP:RSN. An article or book published after 1947 by a reputed academic scholarly publication is something solid, but this source was published before 1947, therefore it is not acceptable as a reference on Wikipedia. There really is no need to take it up for a discussion. Regarding the question you are asking about these 2 communities, I would say that I have not studied about the Koli people so I cannot give you an answer. You must already understand that there has to be a sense of responsibility while writing any views about communities even on the talk pages, and if I cannot back up any point I may make with a WP:RS citation then I better not make a point. Primum non nocere. Sorry, Мастер Шторм (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Мастер Шторм Looks like I went straight to the link I saw in the diff instead of even checking on the publication year lol

. Silly things happen when you do not sleep properly for a week. Thanks for pointing that BTW. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

@2409:4043:2395:21B3:9C05:AEFF:FE36:CE50, Please do not add unsourced content like you did here. The Thakur (title)#Usage clearly mentions with source which communities use the term Thakur as a title. Expand in that section with WP:HISTRS compliant post 1947 source(s) first. No British era sources however, since they have been deprecated by Wikpedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hi,

You can talk to any Thakur in India, Nepal, & Pakistan. They only allow within Rajput caste marriage (As they are against intercaste), You can randomly pick biography of any thakur, You will find all of them as Rajput caste, because Thakur is another name given to Rajputs (decendents of ancient kings administraing the village or region). You can also search Rajput matrimony/jeevansathi/shaadi.com,etc (marriage apps in India), Thakurs would be only found in Rajput category.

Which easily proves the fact. Apart from that you can check and search any song related to term "Thakur" on youtube. You will find the comment of People saying Jai Rajputana (victory to divine Rajputi values and morals). If you still don't believe me, Then apology. We shall raise the request to the right place.

Request you to research with your own wisdom before erasing anyone's comment.

Regards, Thakur Jaiveeraj Singh Gohil, Prince of Bhavnagar Gujarat, India. 150.242.175.245 (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2022

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

CyberMonk26 (talk) 14:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is lot of misinformation change it CyberMonk26 (talk) 14:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 14:29, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thakur

Kshatriya Rajputs were given the status of Thakur in Uttar Pradesh MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 08:04, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]