Talk:Texas Park Road 1

Texas Park Road 1 was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 4, 2014). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

U.S. Roads: Texas Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Texas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Texas Park Road 1/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 03:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 03:01, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would be great if you use different colors for each park road in the KML.
I think you can split up the infobox, like Nebraska Highway 2.
The lengths in the tiny infoboxes do not add up to the the length in the large infobox.
Never duplicate headers.
I think this is more of a list than an article...
Does the PR1 sign actually exist?
Generally, County Roads should not be in junction lists.
"The route makes a 180 degree bend past the dining hall, and passes north of the small clump of trees." Awkward sentence.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: